NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Hawkins Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd v Mac's Industrial Pipework Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 136 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40779/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 May 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 May 2002
PARTIES : Hawkins Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd (ACN 088 362 627) Mac's Industrial Pipework Pty Ltd (ACN 002 139 826) JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1, 23, 27; Stein JA at 24; Davies AJA at 2
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT 2186/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Windeyer J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr V Gray for the Appellant Mr R D Marshall for the Respondent SOLICITORS : Albert A Macri Partners Solicitors for the Appellant Turnbull Hill Lawyers for the Respondent CATCHWORDS : Contracts - whether Building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 applied to contract entered into after commencement of the Act - whether payment claim satisfied requirement of the Act - Corporations - whether employed solicitor may sign a statutory demand on behalf of client LEGISLATION CITED : Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999, s5, s7, s13, Schedule 2 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s459E Deputy Commissioner of Taxation of Victoria v Boxhall (1998) 83 ALR 175 CASES CITED: Hawkins Construction v Mac's Industrial Pipework [2001] NSWSC 815 Metropolitan Waste Disposal Authority v Willoughby Waste Disposals Pty Ltd (1987) 9 NSWLR 7 Re Reference Under s 11 of the Ombudsman Act (1979) 1 ALD 86 DECISION : Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate