NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) Aust Torts Reports 81-667
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : LOXTON v STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES [2002] NSWCA 194 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40482/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 17 June 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 June 2002
PARTIES : Danae Loxton by her next friend Debby Loxton - Applicant State of New South Wales - Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Campbell AJA at 49
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 1439/99 Parramatta FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Delaney DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : W P Kearns SC/B Hughes - Appellant A C Bridge SC - Respondent SOLICITORS : Napier Keen Solicitors - Appellant Hicksons - Respondent CATCHWORDS : DAMAGES - injuries sustained by school student - challenge to trial Judge's findings on damages - distinction between general damages and special damages - future economic loss/ reduced earning capacity - medical expenses - new trial rejected District Court Rules 1973 LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 Suitors' Fund Act 1951 State of New South Wales v Moss (2000) NSWCA 133 Graham v Baker (1961) 106 CLR 340 CASES CITED: Paff v Speed (1961) 105 CLR 549 Jones v Schiffmann (1971) 124 CLR 303 Foster v Tyne and Wear County Council [1986] 1 All ER 567 Griffiths v Kerkemeyer (1977) 139 CLR 161 DECISION : 1 Appeal allowed; 2 Set aside the verdict and judgment of Delaney DCJ of 6 June 2001 ; 3 In lieu thereof verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $199,542.43 made up of general damages of $125,000; Griffiths v Kerkemeyer $18,043.48; agreed out of pocket expenses $1,498.95; future economic loss $40,000; future medical expenses $15,000; together with interest on 50 per cent of the amount awarded for general damages at the rate of 5 per cent and interest on the amount awarded for past care at 5 per cent up to 2 June 2000 and thereafter at 10 per cent to the date of judgment; 4 The respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal but to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 if so entitled; 5 The judgment to date from 6 June 2001.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate