NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60700/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 15/02/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 February 2002
PARTIES : Regina v Billy Zamagias JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 1; Levine J at 2; Howie J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/21/0080 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Karpin DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : R.A. Hulme - Crown T.C. Watts - Respondent SOLICITORS : S.E. O'Connor - Crown Burston, Cole & Co. - Respondent CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law and Procedure - Judgment and Punishment - Suspended sentence - when appropriate. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 - s 33 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - ss 5, 6, 7, 12, 77 Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 H (1980) 3 A Crim R 53 Oliver (1980) 7 A Crim R 174 R v Geddes (1936) 36 SR(NSW) 554 R v Rushby [1977] 1 NSWLR 594 JCE (2000) 120 A Crim R 18 R v Foster [2001] NSWCCA 215 CASES CITED: R v Blackman and Walters [2001] NSWCCA 121 R v Wegener [1999) NSWCCA 405 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 R v T (NSWCCA 19 June 1995) R v Percy [1975] Tas SR 62 Stevens v Giersh (1976) 14 SASR 81 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 R v LRS [2001] NSWCCA 338 R v Saldaneri [2001] NSWCCA 480 DECISION : See para 44.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate