NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Moukhayber v Camden Timber & Hardware Co Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 58 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40747/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 March 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 March 2002
PARTIES : Mohamed Moukhayber (Appellant) Camden Timber & Hardware Co Pty Ltd t/as Camden Timber Mitre 10 (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Beazley JA at 54, 56; Heydon JA at 1; Santow J at 55
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 1714/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Dent DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr S W Gibb SC (Appellant) Mr C R R Hoeben SC (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Orr & Company (Appellant) Tress Cocks & Maddox (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : Tort - Negligence - District Court Appeal - Plaintiff alleged defendant's employee wrongly advised plaintiff to remove safety features from angle grinder - Injury resulting from acting upon alleged advice. - Evidence - Jones v Dunkel point - Plaintiff omitting to call all relevant witnesses - Whether trial judge should have inferred that untendered evidence would not have helped defendant's case - ND. LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Davies v Taylor [1974] AC 207 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 CASES CITED: Payne v Parker [1976] 1 NSWLR 191 Rehsa Shipping Co SA v Edmunds [1985] 1 WLR 948; [1985 2 All ER 71 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40747/00 DC 1714/99
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate