NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Holland [2002] NSWCCA 469 revised - 01/09/2006 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60326/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 November 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 November 2002
PARTIES : Peter James Holland - Appellant Crown - Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Simpson J at 1; Carruthers AJ at 55; Mathews AJ at 56
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 02/11/0084 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Shadbolt DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : P Power - Crown AW Street SC/Ms Soars - Appellant SOLICITORS : SE O'Connor - Crown Van Houten - Appellant CATCHWORDS : aggravated sexual intercourse without consent - attempted sexual intercourse without consent - assault with acts of indecency - verdicts of guilty on two counts, not guilty on three counts - alleged inconsistency of verdicts - directions to jury - effect of doubt concerning credibility or reliability in relation to one count, or more than one count, in relation to other counts - jury question concerning withdrawal of consent - verdicts - evidence of tape recorded telephone conversations between complainant and appellant Listening Devices Act 1984 LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Criminal Appeal Rules - Rule 4 Markuleski v R [2001] NSW CCA 290; 125 A Crim R 186 CASES CITED: R v Jones (1997) 191 CLR 439 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 DECISION : Appeal against convictions dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60326/02
SIMPSON J CARRUTHERS AJ MATHEWS AJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate