NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : PETER R SCHNABEL, PREMIER RIDES INC., STEVEN MARBLE & CATALYST ENTERTAINMENT INC. v KEVIN YUNG LUI, FROYER HOLDINGS DEVELOPMENT & TRADING COMPANY, FROYER HOLDINGS (ASIA) LIMITED, FROYER HOLDINGS USA INC & FSN TOP SECRET PRODUCTIONS INC. [2002] NSWSC 15 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50017/2001 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 July 2001, 20, 21 & 22 November 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 February 2002
Peter R Schnabel, Premier Rides Inc., Steven Marble, Catalyst Entertainment Inc. (Plaintiffs) Kevin Yung Lui (First Defendant) PARTIES : Froyer Holdings development & Trading Company (Second Defendant) Froyer Holdings (Asia) Limited (Third Defendant) Froyer Holdings USA Inc. (Fourth Defendant) FSN Top Secret Productions Inc. (Fifth Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Bergin J
COUNSEL : F Kunc (Plaintiffs) S Epstein SC (First Defendant) SOLICITORS : Deacons Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Frank Low Yeung & Co (First Defendant) CATCHWORDS : [Foreign Judgments] Judgment obtained in the United Stated District Court, Central District of California - Sanctions imposed by US Court "striking" defence and dismissing counterclaim "with prejudice" - Trial on damages - Damages awarded including multiple (quadruple) penal or exemplary damages - Whether the judgment is final and conclusive - Whether the award of multiple damages was a penalty - Whether penalty severable. LEGISLATION CITED : Foreign Judgments Act 1973 Abingdon Rural District Council v O'Gorman [1968] 3 All ER 79 Ainslie v Ainslie (1927) 39 CLR 381; (1926) 26 SR (NSW) 567 Alcatel Australia Ltd v Scarcella (1998) 44 NSWLR 349 Angel v Bullington 330 US 183 Armour v Bate (1891) 2 QB 233 Attorney-General (UK) v Heinemann Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 86; (1988) 165 CLR 30 Attorney-General (UK) v Wellington Newspapers Ltd (1988) 1 NZLR 129 Bank of Bermuda Ltd v Stutz (1965) 2 OR 121 Boyle v Victoria Yukon Trading Company (1902) 9 BCR 213 Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd [1967] 1 AC 853 Clough & Rogers v Frog (1974) 48 ALJR 481 Cohen v McWilliam (1995) 38 NSWLR 476 Cropper v Smith (1884) 26 Ch D 700 Damberg v Damberg [2001] NSWCA 87 Desert Sun Loan Corp v Hill [1996] 2 All ER 847 DSV Silo-und Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v Sennar (Owners) [1985] 2 All ER 104, [1985] 1 WLR 490 Evans v Bartlam (1937) AC 473 Federated Department Stores, Inc v Moitie 452 US 394 Four Embarcadero Centre Venture et al v Kalen et al 65 OR (2d) 551 Four Embarcadero Centre Venture et al. v Mr Greenjeans Corp. et al. (1988) 64 OR (2d) 746 Gray v Motor Accident Commission (1998) 196 CLR 1 Haigh v Haigh (1885) 31 Ch D 478 CASES CITED : Huntington v Attrill [1893] AC 150 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd (2000) 50 NSWLR 640 Jones v Jones (1889) 22 QBD 425 Lamb v Cotogno (1987) 164 CLR 1 Linprint Pty Ltd v Hexham Textiles Pty Ltd (1991) 23 NSWLR 508 Minkler and Kirschbaum v Sheppard (1991) 60 BCLR (2d) 360 Morguard Investments Ltd v de Savoye (1990) 52 BCLR (2d) 160 Nouvion v Freeman (1890) 15 AC 1 Queensland v JL Holdings Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 146 Raulin v Fischer [1911] 2 KB 93 Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 Securities and Exchange Commission v Hasho 134 F.R.D 74 (S.D.N.Y. 1991) Skaggs Companies Inc v Mega Technical Holdings Ltd, Court of Queens Bench Alberta, Judicial District of Edmonton, Unreported, Master Funduk 11.07.00 US v Powell (9th Cir 1994) (24 F. 3d) United States of America v Inkley (1989) 1 QB 255 United States Surgical Corporation v Hospital Products International Pty Ltd [1982] 2 NSWLR 766 Vanquelin v Bouard (1863) 15 CB (NS) 341; 143 ER 817 Wisconsin v The Pelican Insurance Company 127 US (20 Davis) 265 [H Black "Blacks Law Dictionary" 5th edition 1979 Dicey & Morris "The Conflict of Laws" (2000) Sweet & Maxwell Everest & Strode "Law of Estoppel" (1923) Stevens & Sons Ltd. Professor H E Read "Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgment" (1938) Harvard University Press. Law Reform Commission Background Paper 7 "Review of Civil and Administrative Penalties in Federal Jurisdiction" Spencer, Bower, Turner & Handley "The Doctrine of Res Judicata" (1996) Butterworths.] DECISION : See paragraph 181.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate