NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Yang v Hypec Electronics Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) & 2 Ors [2003] NSWCA 181 HEARING DATE(S) : 27 August 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 August 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1, 20, 27; Handley JA at 2; Santow JA at 26 DECISION : (1) Appeal allowed. (2) Order for costs made by Mathews AJ pursuant to SCR Pt 52A r 4(5)(g) set aside. (3) In lieu thereof substitute an order in the same terms against the appellant as a party to the principal proceedings with effect from 28 June 2002. (4) The appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.
CATCHWORDS : COSTS - cross-defendant party to principal proceedings - amenable as such to order for costs of principal proceedings Supreme Court Act 1970 s 76(1) LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 Pt 52A r 4 Supreme Court Rules (Amendment Number 310) 1997 CASES CITED : Insurance Exchange of Australasia v Dooley (2000) 50 NSWLR 222 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 Grace Yang (Appellant) PARTIES : Hypec Electronics Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (First Respondent) Colin Mead (Second Respondent) BL & GY International Company Ltd (Third Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40659/02 COUNSEL : J Kildea (Appellant) V Bedrossian (Second Respondent) SOLICITORS : Ma & Company (Appellant) Etheringtons (First & Second Respondents)
LOWER COURT Supreme Court - Common Law Division JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT SC 12674/97 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Mathews AJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate