NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 121 LGERA 223
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : J & J O'Brien Pty Ltd v South Sydney City Council [2002] NSWCA 259 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40611/01; 40617/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 8 July 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 August 2002
PARTIES : J & J O'Brien Pty Limited (Appellant) South Sydney City Council (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Stein JA at 2; Giles JA at 62
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Land & Environment Court LOWER COURT LEC 11004/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LEC 40160/00 LOWER COURT Cowdroy J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : T S Hale SC/J Jagot (Appellant) J A Ayling SC (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Aubrey F Crawley & Co (Appellant) Pike Pike & Fenwick (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : LOCAL GOVERNMENT - development consent - re-tiling of facade of hotel located in a heritage conservation area - validity of order for demolition and compliance - whether adequate reasons for order - merits appeal - whether development consent necessary - D LEGISLATION CITED : Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 4, s 26, s 34(1), s 75(1), s 121D - S, s 121ZK(1) Interpretation Act 1987 Birch v Allen (1942) 65 CLR 621 CASES CITED: The Minister v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd (1996) 91 LGERA 31 Van Haasteren v South Sydney City Council (2000) 109 LGERA 252 DECISION : Both Appeals dismissed with costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40611/01 CA 40617/01 LEC 11004/00 LEC 40160/00
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate