NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : The Commission for Children & Young People v 'AG' [2002] NSWSC 582 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 13264/01 03/12/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 06/12/01 13/12/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 June 2002
PARTIES : The Commission for Children & Young People v AG JUDGMENT OF : Dowd J
LOWER COURT Administrative Decisions Tribunal JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 014054 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT A Britton JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr P Singleton - Applicant Ms P Lowson - First Respondent SOLICITORS : Crown Solicitors-Applicant Paul MacMahon Associates-First Respondent CATCHWORDS : Application for Declaration as to new application of Act-Powers of Statutory Tribunal-relationship of Crimes Act and Child Protection (Prohibited Employment ) Act 1998- Prerogative relief-relationship of Court with Industrial Relations Commission-comity Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Child Protection (Prohibited Employment ) Act 1998 Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Amendment) Act 1961: Defamation Act 1974 Industrial Relations Act 1996 A v Commission for Children and Young People (2001) 107 IR 211 "AG" v Commission for Children and Young People 2001 NSW ADT 163 Butler v Attorney General for the State of Victoria (1961) 106 CLR 268 Cooper Brooks (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (147 CLR 297 Cobiac v Liddy (1969) 119 CLR 257 CASES CITED : Colin Grassby v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 1 Mathieson v Burton (1971) 124 CLR 1 Meagher v Stephenson (1993) 30 NSWLR 736 Totalizator Agency Board v TAB Agents' Association of New South Wales (1995) 59 IR 36 R v Sales (1989) 42 A Crim R 297 Sarris & Guise v Penfolds Wine Pty Ltd [1962] NSWLR 801 DECISION : 1. An Order removing the record of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal in "AG v Commission for Children & Young People" [2001] NSW ADT 163, be brought up to this Court.; 2. That the Declaration made by the Administrative Decisions Tribunal be quashed.; 3. That an Order dismissing the Application be entered.; 4. That costs be reserved, and; 5. That the continuation of the interim orders be reserved for further argument.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate