NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Stark v Dandala P/L (formerly Prestige Smash Repairs) & 2 Ors [2002] NSWSC 442 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20937/2001 HEARING DATE(S) : 2 May 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 May 2002
James Stephen Stark (Plaintiff)
Dandala Pty Limited (formerly Prestige Smash Repairs Australiasia Pty Limited) (First Defendant) PARTIES : Paddington Prestige Smash Repairs Pty Limited (Second Defendant)
F1 Auto Body Pty Limited (previously Paddington Prestige Smash Repairs (Waterloo) Pty Limited) (Third Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
Mr B McManamey (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr Snell (Defendants) Turner Freeman (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Goldbergs (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : Leave to commence proceedings - s 151D WCA LEGISLATION CITED : Workers Compensation Act 1987 Salido v Nominal Defendant (1993) 32 NSWLR 524 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541; 139 ALR 1 CASES CITED : Holt v Wynter [2000]] NSWCA 143; (2000) 49 NSWLR 128 Seib v Morton [2000] NSWCA 139, 26 June 2000 McLean v Sydney Water Corporation [2001] NSWCA 122 Parsons v Doukas [2001] NSWCA 128, (2001) 52 NSWLR 162 DECISION : (1) Grant leave for the plaintiff to commence court proceedings in respect of work injuries from 1987 to 1997. Such leave is granted up to and including 23 November 2001; (2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate