NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : EMMETT v HORNSBY SHIRE COUNCIL & ANOR [2002] NSWCA 75 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40792/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 11 March 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 March 2002
Margaret Lorraine Emmett - Appellant PARTIES : Hornsby Shire Council - First Respondent Patchmaster Roadworks Pty Limited - Second Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 10329/97 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Puckeridge DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : M G Stubbs - Claimant/Appellant S Glascott - Opponent/Respondent SOLICITORS : G H Healey & Co - Sydney - Claimant/Appellant Phillips Fox - Opponent/Respondent CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - dismissed for want of prosecution - self executing orders - powers of Registrar - failed to give reasons for dismissal - Supreme Court Act 1970 - Supreme Court Rules 1970 LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 Supreme Court Act 1970 Birkett v James [1978] AC 297 Allen v McAalpine [1968] 2 QB 229 CASES CITED: Fairey v Fairey (No 2) [2000] NSWCA 173 Lenijamar Pty Ltd v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 388 FAI General Insurance Company Limited v Southern Cross Exploration NL (1988) 165 CLR 268 DECISION : 1 Set aside the order made by the Registrar on 4 October 2001; 2 Extend the time for the filing of submissions by the appellant until twenty-one days from the date of this judgment; 3 The appellant to pay the respondent's costs of this application; 4 Otherwise remit the appeal to the Registrar.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate