NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : State Bank v Tela (No 2) [2002] NSWSC 20 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5437/2001 HEARING DATE(S) : 29/01/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 February 2002
PARTIES : State Bank of New South Wales - Plaintiff Tela Pty Limited - Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
COUNSEL : Mr R.S. Hollo - Plaintiff Mr J.A. Darvall - Defendant SOLICITORS : Minter Ellison - Plaintiff Conomos & Spinak Lawyers - Defendant CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - unsatisfied and unchallenged statutory demand - alleged abuse of process - no improper purpose in light of current statutory scheme LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Brolrik Pty Ltd v Sambah Holdings Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 1171 Carson v Legal Services Commissioner [2000] NSWCA 308 David Grant & Co Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1995) 184 CLR 265 CASES CITED : Gramwick Investments Pty Ltd v Advanced Underpinning Pty Ltd (2001) 19 ACLC 593 House of Tan Pty Ltd v Beachiris Pty Ltd (1996) 21 ACSR 527 Liverpool Cement Renderers (Aust) Pty Ltd v Landmarks Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd (1996) 19 ACSR 411 Redglove Holdings Pty Ltd v GNE & Associates Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 867 Re J & E Holdings Pty Ltd (1995) 36 NSWLR 541 DECISION : Order for winding up
2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BARRETT J
FRIDAY, 1 FEBRUARY 2002
5437/2001 – STATE BANK OF NEW SOUTH WALES v TELA PTY LIMITED (NO 2) JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate