NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Graham Leonard Brand & Ors v Digi-Tech (Australia) Limited & Ors; Christopher Gerard Kelliher & Ors v Digi-Tech (Australia) Limited & Ors [2002] NSWSC 996 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50169/99; 50087/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 23/5/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 May 2002
Graham Leonard Brand & Ors (Plaintiffs) Christopher Gerard Kelliher & Ors (Plaintiffs) McLean Pty Ltd, AI McLean Pty Ltd (Plaintiffs) PARTIES : Digi-Tech (Australia) Limited (1st Defendant) Digi-Tech Equities Limited (2nd Defendant) Digi-Tech Communications (3rd Defendant) John Anthony Reid (4th Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
COUNSEL : Mr A J Meagher SC, Mr I M Jackman (Plaintiffs) Mr J C Sheahan SC, Mr M Christie (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Atanaskovic Hartnell (Plaintiffs) Blake Dawson Waldron (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : Evidence - Expert evidence given by accountant - Technical terms - Whether use of words in accounting context have accepted technical meaning - Evidence Act S.80 - Whether accountant qualified as having specialised knowledge so as to express opinion on meaning of words used in contract - Relevance LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995. S.80 CASES CITED : Ancher, Mortlock, Murray & Woolley Pty Ltd v Hooker Homes Pty Ltd, [1971] 2 NSWLR 278 Idoport Pty Ltd & Anor v National Australia Bank Ltd & Ors 50 NSWLR 640 DECISION : Rulings to be found in Judgment given.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION COMMERCIAL LIST
EINSTEIN J
Thursday 23 May 2002 Ex Tempore Revised 24 October 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate