NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : The Ombudsman v Robert Koopman [2002] NSWSC 1203 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law Division Adminstrative Law List FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30060/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 December 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 December 2002
The Ombudsman (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Robert Koopman (First Defendant) Administrative Decisions Tribunal (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J
LOWER COURT Administrative Decisions Tribunal JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 023005 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT O'Connor DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : G Furness (Plaintiff) P Singleton (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Sparke Helmore (Plaintiff) IV Knight Crown Solicitor (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : Proceudre - courts & judges - proceedings to prohibit proceedings in Administrative Decisions Tribunal - assignment of business - Court of Appeal or Administrative Law List Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997, LEGISLATION CITED : s 119 Ombudsman Act 1974 Supreme Court Act, ss 48, 51 Daykin v SAS Trustee Corporation [2001] NSWSC 58, 51 NSWLR 328 CASES CITED : Lloyd v Veterinary Surgeons Investigating Committee [2002] NSWCA 224 NSW Breeding & Racing v Administrative Decisions Tribunal [2001] NSWSC 494, 53 NSWLR 559 Puglisi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal Appeal Panel [2001] NSWCCA 298, 52 NSWLR 350 DECISION : Proceedings to be removed into the Court of Appeal.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate