NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Goulding & Anor v Kirby [2002] NSWCA 393 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41078/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 23/09/2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 December 2002
PARTIES : Leonard Charles Goulding and Ruth Goulding (Appellants) Robert Raymond Kirby (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Heydon JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Santow JA at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 7012/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Certoma ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : A Ogborne (Appellants) J Coombs, QC/ G Ellis (Respondent) SOLICITORS : The Bruce & Stewart Commercial Practice (Appellants) Colin Biggers & Paisley (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - economic loss - failure to properly prepare walls before applying paint - failure to ensure paint properly adhered to walls Annes v Merton London Borough Council [1978] AC 728 Bryan v Maloney (1994-1995) 182 CLR 609 CASES CITED: Perre v Apand (1999) 198 CLR 180 Tame v State of New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd (2002) 76 ALJR 1348 Woollahra Municipal Council v Sved (1996) 40 NSWLR 101 Zumpano v Montagnese [1997] 2 VR 525 DECISION : (1) Leave to appeal refused; (2) Appellants to pay Respondent's costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 41078/01 DC 7012/00
HEYDON JA HODGSON JA SANTOW JA
9 DECEMBER 2002 Leonard Charles GOULDING & Anor -v- Robert Raymond KIRBY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate