NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : State of New South Wales v Karen Therese Stevens [2003] NSWCA 298 HEARING DATE(S) : 02/09/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 October 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Santow JA at 2; Davies AJA at 3 DECISION : Appeal allowed. Orders para [60].
CATCHWORDS : Negligence - whether Department of Education and Training owed duty of care to a speech pathologist employed by the Department of Community Services but working in a school - whether duty of care breached - whether duty to protect staff against violence by children - whether duty breached in circumstance that child was autistic with severe intellectual disability - whether breach could be proved in absence of expert evidence - whether s151Z(2) of the Worker's Compensation Act 1987 should be applied to reduce the damages awarded LEGISLATION CITED : Workers Compensation Act 1987 s 151Z (2) Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40 Haines v Tempesta (1995) 37 NSWLR 24 TNT Australia Pty Limited v Christie [2003] NSWCA 47 CASES CITED : Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co. v English [1938] AC 57 Kondis v State Transport Authority (1984) 154 CLR 673 Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562 F v R (1983) 33 SASR 189 Rogers v Whittaker (1992) 175 CLR 479 PARTIES : Appellant: State of New South Wales Respondent: Karen Therese Stevens FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41013/02 COUNSEL : Appellant: Mr J.D. Hislop QC, Mr G.P. Rundle Respondent: Mr S.G. Campbell SC, Mr T. Bland SOLICITORS : Appellant: Hicksons Lawyers Respondent: Garrett Walmsley Madgwick Lawyers
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate