NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Lim & Yeung [2002] NSWCCA 293 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60646/01; 60876/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 June 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 July 2002
Cheong Boon Lim - Appellant PARTIES : Chi Wai Yeung - Appellant Crown - Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; O'Keefe J at 2; Simpson J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 01/11/0507 01/11/0566 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Backhouse DCJ OFFICER :
MC Ramage QC - Lim (Appellant) COUNSEL : SJ Odgers SC - Yeung (Appellant) M Allnutt - Crown Naomi Hamilton - Lim (Appellant) SOLICITORS : Nyman Gibson & Co - Yeung (Appellant) Cth DPP - Respondent CATCHWORDS : appeals against conviction - possession of not less than commercial quantity of prohibited imports - evidence of intercepted telephone calls to which appellants were not party - admissibility of statements made by participants to joint criminal enterprise against other alleged participants - reasonable evidence of pre-concert - prejudicial value of evidence vis-a-vis probative value - not tendency evidence - verdicts not unsafe and unsatisfactory - conversations in furtherance of conspiracy - application for leave to appeal against sentence - error in finding judgment verdict entailed knowledge of actual quantity of drugs - nevertheless no error in sentencing process LEGISLATION CITED : Customs Act 1901 Evidence Act 1995 Tripody v R (1961) 104 CLR 1 CASES CITED: Ahern v R (1988) 165 CLR 87 R v AH (1997) 42 NSWLR 702 DECISION : Appeals against conviction dismissed. Leave granted to Yeung to appeal against sentence; appeal dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate