NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : McDonald v Livestock Transport (Sydney) Pty Limited [2003] NSWCA 166 HEARING DATE(S) : 30 May 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 June 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Handley JA at 2; McColl JA at 3 DECISION : 1) Appeal allowed. 2) Set aside the judgment of the District Court as to quantum. 3) Remit the matter to the District Court for a rehearing limited to quantum. 4) Dismiss the Cross-Appeal. 5) Respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the Appeal and the Cross-Appeal, but to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 in respect of the costs of the appeal, if qualified.
CATCHWORDS : DAMAGES - inconsistent reasons - inconsistent assessment of damages - whether any pre-existing disabilities, pain and suffering were subsumed by a subsequent injury - D LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules Part 51 Rule 23 Allied Pastoral Holdings Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [1983] 1 NSWLR 1 Browne v Dunn (1894) 6 R 67 CASES CITED : Commercial Union Assurance Company of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd and Another (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 Franklins Self Serve Pty Ltd v Wyber (1999) 48 NSWLR 249 Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794 Kempsey District Hospital v Thackham (1995) 36 NSWLR 492 PARTIES : Paul David McDonald (Appellant) Livestock Transport (Sydney) Pty Limited (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40184/02 COUNSEL : D.G.T. Nock SC (Appellant) W.P. Kearns SC/S.A. Fonti (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Stacks - The Law Firm (Appellant) CKB Partners (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate