NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : SQUILLACIOTI v RTA & ANOR [2002] NSWCA 133 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40934/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 22 April 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 May 2002
ROSE SQUILLACIOTI v PARTIES : ROADS AND TRAFFIC AUTHORITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES and LIVERPOOL COUNCIL JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Stein JA at 37; Heydon JA at 38
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 9391/97 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Balla ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
Appellant - G B Hall QC/P A Regattieri COUNSEL : Respondent 1 - J E Maconachie QC/ I L Harvey Respondent 2 - I G Harrison SC/G J Grogin Appellant - R J Rimes SOLICITORS : Respondent 1 - Tress Cocks & Maddox Respondent 2 - Crown Solicitor's Office CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - foreseeability - knowledge LEGISLATION CITED : The Roads Act 1993 Brodie v Singleton Shire Council (2001) 75 ALJR 992 CASES CITED: The Popi M [1985] 1 WLR 948 HL Luxton v Vines (1952) 85 CLR 352 DECISION : Appeal allowed - orders made
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40934/98 DC 9391/97 HANDLEY JA STEIN JA HEYDON JA
13 May 2002 ROSE SQUILLACIOTI v ROADS & TRAFFIC AUTHORITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES & ANOR
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate