NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v CJP; Regina v CAD; Regina v MES [2003] NSWCCA 187 revised - 10/12/2003 HEARING DATE(S) : 28 May 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 July 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Hidden J at 1; Carruthers AJ at 1 DECISION : See pars 73-75 of judgment.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - sentencing - Crown appeals - pleas of guilty - whether sentences endorsed by District Court Judge, in the absence of the parties, on Committal for Sentence Form validly imposed - delay of three months between imposition of sentences and publication of reasons - requirement for sentences to be accompanied by contemporaneous reasons emphasised - whether any sentences validly imposed - necessity for all matters to be remitted to the District Court. Crimes Act 1900 ss 4, 61J, 61J(1), 61N(1), 66C(1), 66C(2), 78L, 345, 580E(2), 580E(4) LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss 22(2), 22(4), 32, 33, 44, 62(1), 70, 70(3) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s12(2) District Court Rules Pt31 r9 AB v The Queen (1999) 198 CLR 111 Ebatarinja v Deland (1998) 194 CLR 444 Housing Commission (NSW) v Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 378 Jago v District Court (NSW) (1989) 168 CLR 23 Kunnath v The State [1993] 1 WLR 1315 Lawrence v The King [1933] AC 699 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 CASES CITED : Pettit v Dunkley [1971] 1 NSWLR 376 Public Service Board (NSW) v Osmond (1986) 159 CLR 656 R v Cornwell [1972] 2 NSWLR 1 R v Julie Ann Duffy [1999] NSWCCA 321 R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v JCE (2000) 120 A Crim R 18 R v Jones (No 2) (1972) 1 WLR 887 Richmond Newspapers v Virginia 448 US 555 (1980) Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 PARTIES : Regina v CJP; Regina v CAD; Regina v MES FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60030/03; 60031/03; 60032/03 Crown - G.I. Rowling COUNSEL : Respondent CJP - H. Dhanji Respondent CAD - J.P. Butland Respondent MES - J. Stratton Crown - S.E. O'Connor SOLICITORS : Respondent CJP - D.J. Humphreys Respondent CAD - Bilias & Associates Respondent MES - Velcic & Company
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate