NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 128 LGERA 419 58 NSWLR 631
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : VAW (Kurri Kurri) Pty Ltd v Scientific Committee (Established under s127 of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995) [2003] NSWCA 297 HEARING DATE(S) : 7 March 2003; 10 March 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 October 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Beazley JA at 61; Hodgson JA at 214 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : ENVIRONMENTAL LAW - endangered ecological community - listing process in Threatened Species Conservation Act - validity of final determination to list community - distinction between initiating mechanisms - assemblage of species - particular area ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - validity of determinations of Scientific Committee - requirement to advertise reasons for determinations - where published reasons restated statutory formula - sufficiency of reasons - certainty of findings in final determination - non-compliance with statutory provision for nominations - availability of alternative power to support listing - whether different consequences of statute under alternative powers - reasonable apprehension of bias PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to reopen case - discretion to allow reopening - where inconsistent tactical decisions and legal claims by both parties - where new evidence on critical matter in proceedings Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Broadcasting and Television Act 1942 (Cth) Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth) s 160 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 100A LEGISLATION CITED : Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (Cth) s 18 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 ss 118A, 181 National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act 1975 (Cth) Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973 (Cth) s 7 Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 ss 3, 4, 6, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 127, 128, 133, 134 Abbott v Shire of Heidelberg [1926] VLR 199 Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1989) 88 ALR 287 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal & Actors Equity of Australia Ltd v Saatchi & Saatchi Compton (Vic) Pty Ltd (1985) 10 FCR 1 Australian Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden [2002] NSWCA 419 Bass v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 334 Brown v Petranker (1991) 22 NSWLR 717 Brown v West (1990) 169 CLR 195 Canwest Global Communications Corporation v Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Australia (1997) 147 ALR 509 Dalton v Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 160 CLR 246 Dixon v Esperance Bay Turf Club (Inc) [2002] WASC 110 Genkem Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1994) 35 NSWLR 33 Harris v Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (1999) 162 ALR 651 Harts Australia Limited v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (2002) 117 FCR 358 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 CASES CITED : Iveagh (Earl) v Minister of Housing and Local Government [1964] 1 QB 395 Johns v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 178 CLR 408 Kentucky Fried Chicken Pty Ltd v Gantidis (1979) 140 CLR 675 Lockwood v The Commonwealth (1953) 90 CLR 177 Mercantile Mutual Life Insurance v Australian Securities Commission (1992) 40 FCR 409 MIMA v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597 Minister for Immigration v Yusuf (2001) 75 ALJR 1105 Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd (1996) 91 LGERA 31 Moore v The Attorney General (Irish Free State) [1935] AC 484 Newcrest Mining (WA) Ltd v The Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 513 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 R v Bevan; Ex parte Elias and Gordon (1942) 66 CLR 452 Racecourse Co-operative Sugar Association Ltd v Attorney-General (Qld) (1979) 142 CLR 460 Ramos v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1998) 53 ALD 64 Tasker v Fullwood [1978] 1 NSWLR 20 Urban Transport Authority of New South Wales v Nweiser (1991) 28 NSWLR 471 PARTIES : Appellant: VAW (Kurri Kurri) Pty Ltd Respondent: Scientific Committee (Established under s127 of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40555/02 COUNSEL : Appellant: S Rares SC / M Leeming Respondent: B Walker SC / B Preston SC / S Pritchard SOLICITORS : Appellant: Blake Dawson Waldron Respondent: Vivienne Karen Ingram (NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate