NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : BATISTE & 2 ORS v LENIN [2002] NSWSC 233 CURRENT JURISDICTION: EQUITY FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3548 of 2001 HEARING DATE(S) : 11/3/02 - 15/3/02 & 18/3/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 April 2002
Donna Batiste - First Plaintiff PARTIES : Hazaran Pty Ltd - Second Plaintiff Chrysalis Holdings Pty Ltd - Third Plaintiff Michael Petrovic Lenin - Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Bryson J at 1
COUNSEL : L.J. Aitken & P. Rogers - Plaintiffs M. Walton S.C. & G. Curtin - Defendant SOLICITORS : Horowitz & Bilinsky - Plaintiffs Phillips Fox - Defendant CATCHWORDS : LANDLORD and TENANT - re-entry - breaches of lessee's covenants to pay rent, construct fire stairs, pay outgoings - cross-claim for possession of Great Northern Hotel Newcastle - numerous issues on meaning and effect of lease - lessee claimed right of recoupment out of rent under Lee-Parker v. Izzett [1971] 1 WLR (Goff J) - covenant for payment of rent provided for payment without deduction - on the construction of the lease the lessor had no obligation to do the works for cost of which lessee claimed recoupment - alleged implied term requiring work to be performed by lessor rejected. TRADE PRACTICES - misleading or deceptive conduct - plaintiff claimed that misleading representations were made in negotiations for lease of Great Northern Hotel Newcastle - on the facts it was found that the representations were not made - consideration of time bar in Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) s68(2). Fair Trading Act (New South Wales) 1987 LEGISLATION CITED : Local Government Act 1919 Local Government Act 1993 Ch.7 Conveyancing Act 1919 Wardley Australia Ltd v. Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 Kenny & Good Pty Ltd v. MGICA (1999) 199 CLR 413 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v. State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337 Lee-Parker v. Izzet [1971] 1WLR 1688 CASES CITED : British Anzani (Felixstowe) Ltd v. International Marine Management (UK) Ltd [1980] 1 QB 137 Sapford v. Fletcher (1792) 4 Term. 511 Debonair Nominees Pty Ltd v. J & K Berry Nominees Pty Ltd (2000) 77 SASR 261 Lambert Pty Ltd v. Papadatos Pty Ltd (1991) 5 ACSR 468 DECISION : Claim under Fair Trading act rejected - cross-claimant recovers possession. See para [114]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate