NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2003) 127 LGERA 95
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : HURSTVILLE CITY COUNCIL v HUTCHISON 3G AUSTRALIA PTY LTD [2003] NSWCA 179 HEARING DATE(S) : 28 May 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 July 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Handley JA at 73; McColl JA at 74 DECISION : Appeal allowed. See par 72 for orders
CATCHWORDS : Statutory Interpretation - Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) Sch 3 Pt 1 Div 4 cl 7 - "maintain a facility" - whether Council-owned light pole a "facility" under the Act - whether respondent authorised by the Act to remove and replace light pole. (D) Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Hurstville Local Environmental Plan 1994 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Botany Municipal Council v Federal Airports Authority (1992) 175 CLR 453 Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427 Council of the Municipality of Randwick v Rutledge (1959) 102 CLR 54 Friends of Pryor Park Inc v Ryde City Council (1996) 91 LGERA 302 CASES CITED : Gibb v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1966) 118 CLR 628 Hurstville City Council v Hutchison 3G Australia Pty Ltd [2003] NSWLEC 52 Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1 The King v Wallis; Ex parte H v Mackay Massey Harris Pty Ltd (1949) 78 CLR 529 Victoria v The Commonwealth (1937) 58 CLR 618 PARTIES : HURSTVILLE CITY COUNCIL v HUTCHISON 3G AUSTRALIA PTY LTD FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40207/2003 COUNSEL : Appellant: F M Douglas QC/ K M Connor Respondent: S Gageler/ D Wilson SOLICITORS : Appellant: Deacons Respondent: Truman Hoyle
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate