NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 12 ANZ Insurance Cases 61-544
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Australia Limited -v- Betta Industries Pty Limited; Harlander Pty Limited (in liq) -v- State of New South Wales [2002] NSWCA 323 revised - 01/10/2002 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41027/01; 41039/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 August 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 September 2002
Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Australia Limited (Appellant) Betta Industries Pty Limited (Respondent) PARTIES : Harlander Pty Limited (in liquidation) (Appellant) State of New South Wales (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Santow JA at 2; Davies AJA at 80
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales LOWER COURT DDT 194 of 1996/1/2/3 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Curtis J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
Royal & Sun: F M Douglas, QC/ G M Watson Harlander: C Hoeben, QC/ T Duggon COUNSEL : Betta Industries: S R Donaldson, SC/ I Mescher State of NSW: P Blackett, SC/ M Robinson
Royal & Sun: Church & Grace SOLICITORS : Harlander: Dibbs Barker Gosling Betta Industries: Stafford & Associates State of NSW: Crown Solicitors Office CATCHWORDS : INSURANCE - public risk insurance - construction of policy - question of what risk covered by policy - NEGLIGENCE - duty of care - failure to warn - whether the defendant knew of the danger to which the plaintiff bystander was exposed Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 (NSW) s32 LEGISLATION CITED : Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) s5 Public Service Act 1902 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Limited (HC, 27 April 1951, unreported) Burnie Port Authority v General Jones (1993-94) 179 CLR 520 Crimmins v Stevedoring Industry Finance Committee (1999) 200 CLR 1 CASES CITED: Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Perre v Apand Pty Limited (1999) 198 CLR 180 Pyrenees Shire Council v Day (1998) 192 CLR 330 Semrani v Manoun; Williams v Manoun ([2001] NSWCA 337, 4 October 2001, unreported) Sullivan v Moody (2001) 183 ALR 405 Voli v Englewood Shire Council (1962-63) 110 CLR 74 DECISION : ORDERS; Insurance Appeal (Royal & Sun Alliance -v- Betta Industries); (1) That the appeal be allowed ; (2) That the relevant parts of the judgment and orders of Judge Curtis made on 21 November 2001 be set aside and that in lieu thereof the cross-claim be dismissed with costs; (3) That the Respondent pay the Appellant's costs of this appeal; Duty of Care Appeal (Harlander -v- State of New South Wales); (1) The appeal be dismissed; (2) The Appellant pay the Respondent's costs in the appeal
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate