NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 134 A Crim R 174
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Palu [2002] NSWCCA 381 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60284/2002 HEARING DATE(S) : 13/09/2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 September 2002
PARTIES : Regina v Iteni Sivo Palu JUDGMENT OF : Levine J at 1; Hidden J at 2; Howie J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 01/21/3289 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Coorey DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : P Ingram - Crown C Craigie - Respondent SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor - Crown D J Humphreys - Respondent CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law and Procedure - Sentence - Adjournment under s 11 of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act unjustified - failure of sentencing judge to find facts before making order - effect of statements by offender in pre-sentence report. Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - ss 11, 86(4) LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s 5D Crimes Act 1900 - ss 33, 35 Evidence Act 1995 R v Trindall [2002] NSWCCA 364 Chow v DPP (1992) 28 NSWLR 593 The Queen v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 CASES CITED: Altham (1992) 62 A Crim R 126 Tindall v Gunton (1994) 74 A Crim R 275 R v Glen (NSWCCA, unreported 19 December 1994) Henderson (NSWCCA, unreported 5 November 1997) R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 DECISION : See paragraph 44.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60284/02
LEVINE J HIDDEN J HOWIE J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate