NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 128 A Crim R 44
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v MacDonnell [2002] NSWCCA 34 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60690/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 4/2/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 March 2002
PARTIES : Regina Glen Lawrence MacDonnell JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1; Sully J at 60; Dowd J at 61
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/11/0321 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Woods DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : R A Hulme (Crown) S J Odgers SC (Respondent) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Crown) Watsons (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Crown appeal against sentence - supply of heroin, methylamphetamine and cocaine - manifest inadequacy of sentence due to significant role played by respondent in supply - trial judge incorrectly assessed respondent's level of contrition, and the utiilitarian value of late plea of guilty - discount for asssitance erroneously applied wholly to the non parole period - excessive weight given to subjective circumstances - accumulation of sentence more appropriate than concurrency due to duration, frequency and volume of drug supply - appeal allowed - respondent resentenced. Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999; s 23, 44(2) LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 ; s 5D Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985; s 32, 33(3a) AB v The Queen (1999) 198 CLR 111 Cameron v The Queen [2002] HCA 6 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 74 ALJR 1538 Everett v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 Regina v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 56 Regina v Cartwright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243 Regina v Charles Michael Cassar [1999] NSWCCA 152 Regina v Ceissman [2001] NSWCCA 73 Regina v Darwiche [1999] NSWCCA 297 CASES CITED: Regina v Giam (No. 2) (1999) 109 A Crim R 348 Regina v Glasby [2000] NSWCCA 83 Regina v Khaled Hamzy (1994) 74 A Crim R 341 Regina v Syed Tareq Hameed [2001] NSWCCA 287 Regina v Laurentio and Becheru (1992) 63 A Crim R 402 Regina v Qing Quan Liang NSWCCA, 2 June 1995 Regina v Paul Kon Lim, NSWCCA 28 September 1993 Regina v Lowe (1984) 154 CLR 606 Regina v Reid [2000] NSWCCA 166 Regina v Thomson and Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 Regina v Williams, NSWCCA 24 July 1990 Vogel v Anderson (1967) 120 CLR 157 Wong and Leung v The Queen (2001) 76 ALJR 79 DECISION : Appeal allowed. Sentences in respect of counts 1 and 3 quashed. Respondent resentenced. See para 56.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate