NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) Aust Contract Reports 90-147
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Delpin Pty Ltd v Nargol Holdings Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 422 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3815 of 1997 HEARING DATE(S) : 20-22, 25-28 February; 1, 4-8, 13-14 March 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 May 2002
Delpin Pty Limited (1st Plaintiff/1st Cross Defendant) Donna Burgess (2nd Plaintiff/ 2nd Cross Defendant) Robert A Chow (3rd Plaintiff/3rd Cross Defendant) Robert Elliott (4th Plaintiff/4th Cross Defendant) Joe Gangemi (5th Plaintiff/5th Cross Defendant) Peter Hay (7th Plaintiff/6th Cross Defendant) George Hayunga (8th Plaintiff/7th Cross Defendant) Steven Lee (9th Plaintiff/8th Cross Defendant) PARTIES : Barbara McDonald (10th Plaintiff/9th Cross Defendant) Geoffrey Raymond Morgans (11th Plaintiff/10th Cross Defendant) Ismail Motala (12th Plaintiff/11th Cross Defendant) John Whyte (13th Plaintiff/12th Cross Defendant) Frank Vella (14th Plaintiff/13th Cross Defendant) Nargol Holdings Pty Limited (1st Defendant/Cross Claimant) Bronte Douglass (2nd Defendant) PHLM Pty Limited (14th Cross Defendant) Castle Hill Medical Centre (NSW) Pty Limited (15th Cross Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
COUNSEL : Mr J T Gleeson SC with him Mr C Moore (Plaintiffs/Cross Defendants) Mr P M Biscoe QC with him Mr S W Climpson (Defendants/Cross Claimant) SOLICITORS : Manion McCosker (Plaintiffs/Cross Defendants) Hendersons (Defendants/Cross Claimant) CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS - terms discussed at meetings between parties - whether agreement reached on terms - whether additional terms required - whether necessary consensus to form binding contract without formalization - MISLEADING AND DECEPTIVE CONDUCT AND ESTOPPEL - whether representations if made and if relied upon resulted in damage to person to whom made - whether letter of commitment created obligation to enter agreement for lease - whether obligations under agreement arose from representations - FIDUCIARIES - contracts between individual doctors and company providing services including premises to these doctors - contractual provision requiring doctors to act in utmost good faith towards manager - whether fiduciary relationship established - PASSING OFF - name and telephone number associated with the centre - whether centre manager had property in the name as goodwill of business - doctors at centre continuing to use name after management agreements ended - whether centre manager had established any reputation for the business in that name - no evidence of reputation - EQUITY - REMEDIES - PASSING OFF - no claim for injunction - whether account of profits available if no injunction sought Business Names Act 1962 Fair Trading Act 1987, s42 LEGISLATION CITED : Health Insurance Act 1973 Trade Practices Act 1974 s52 Ashburner's Principles of Equity 2nd Ed p40 Meagher Gummow & Lehane Equity Doctrines and Remedies 3rd Ed 2504 A G v Blake [2000] 4 All ER 385 Bailey v Taylor [1829] 1 Russ & M 73; 39 ER 28 Baulkham Hills Private Hospital Pty Ltd v G R Securities Pty Ltd 91996) 40 NSWLR 63 CASES CITED : Draper v Trist [1939] 3 All ER 513 Fletcher Challenge Limited v Fletcher Challenge Pty Ltd [1981] 1 NSWLR 196 Rolin v Steward [1854] CB 595 Smith v The London and South Western Railway Company [1854] Kay 408; 69 ER 173 DECISION : See paragraph 71
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate