NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 136 A Crim R 55
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Weldon; Regina v Carberry [2002] NSWCCA 475 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60446/02; 60447/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 04/12/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 December 2002
PARTIES : Regina v Daniel Robert Weldon; Regina v Gregory John Carberry JUDGMENT OF : Ipp JA at 1; Hulme J at 63; Bell J at 64
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 02/71/0031; 02/71/0033 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Norrish DCJ OFFICER :
D C Frearson (Crown) COUNSEL : R W Killalea (Respondent Weldon) R J Button (Respondent Carberry) S E O'Connor (Crown) SOLICITORS : D Perkins (Respondent Weldon) D J Humphreys (Respondent Carberry) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - Crown appeal against sentences - whether sentences manifestly inadequate - whether wholly concurrent sentences failed to account for the criminal conduct of each offence - principles - calculation of aggregate sentences - application of totality principle - Crimes Act 1900, ss 35(1)(a), 98 - appeals upheld. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900, ss 35(1)(a), 35(2), 98 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s 44 Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 Hoare v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 348 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 CASES CITED: R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534 R H McL v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 452 The Queen v Carr [2002] NSWCA 434 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 Wilkins (1988) 38 A Crim R 445 DECISION : See paras 57-62
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate