NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bell Construction Services P/L v Form-Kwip Building Services P/L [2001] NSWSC 73 revised - 28/02/2001 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4606/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 19/02/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 February 2001
In the matter of Bell Construction Services Pty Limited (ACN 070 106 955) PARTIES : Bell Construction Services Pty Limited (Plaintiff) Form-Kwip Building Services Pty Limited (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : P Walsh (Plaintiff) J T Johnson (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Kacir Safi & Halligan (Plaintiff) Sally Nash & Co (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS — Application to set aside a statutory demand — Compliance with s459G of the Corporations Law — Unintended omissions from affidavit supporting application to set aside but no discrepancy between affidavit filed and affidavit served — Affidavit in support of application conforms to s459G(3) — Genuine dispute established. Corporations Law s459G LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Law Rules rule 2.4(2) Supreme Court Rules of Western Australia O37 r2(8) Callite Pty Ltd v Peter John Adams & 3 Ors [2001] NSWSC 52 (Santow J, 16 February 2001, unreported) CASES CITED : David Grant & Co Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1995) 184 CLR 265 Eyota Pty Limited v Hanave Pty Limited (1994) 12 ACSR 785 Robowash Pty Ltd v Robowash Finance Pty Ltd [2000] WASCA 409, (19 December 2000, unreported) DECISION : Application to set aside statutory demand succeeds.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate