NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 54 NSWLR 690
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Union Shipping New Zealand Ltd v Morgan [2002] NSWCA 124 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40379/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 28 February 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 June 2002
PARTIES : Union Shipping New Zealand Ltd (Appellant) Sean Morgan (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Heydon JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 120; Santow JA at 121
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT SC 20273/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Sperling J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr A S Bell/Mr R D Glasson (Appellant) Mr J D Hislop QC/Mr J A Kernick (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Norton White (Appellant) Carroll & O'Dea (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : Conflict of laws - choice of law in tort - defendant company incorporated in New Zealand - plaintiff natural person resident in New Zealand - plaintiff employee of defendant - plaintiff suffering tortious injury during course of employment on defendant's barge - barge sailing under New Zealand flag - vessel wholly within Australian territorial waters - anchored in harbour unloading coal - whether law governing dispute Australian or New Zealand law - Conflict of laws - forum non conveniens - factors persuading court whether to dismiss Notice of Motion or to grant permanent stay of proceedings - Courts - precedent - doctrine of stare decisis - relevance of non-binding foreign authority where no binding authority obtains - D LEGISLATION CITED : Interpretation Act 1987 Private International Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1995 Boys v Chapman [1971] AC 356 Carr v Fracis Times & Co [1902] AC 176 Chow Hung Ching v R (1948) 77 CLR 449 Chung Chi Cheung v R [1939] AC 160 Commonwealth v Mewett (1997) 191 CLR 471 Cook v Cook (1986) 162 CLR 376 Cunard Steamship Co Ltd v Mellon 262 US 100 (1923) Far Eastern Shipping Co Ltd v Abrankin [1999] VSCA 107 Fisher v Agios Nicolaus V 628 F 2d 308 (1980) Hellenic Lines Ltd v Rhoditis 398 US 306 (1970) John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson (2000) 203 CLR 503 Lauritzen v Larsen 345 US 571 (1953) M'Elroy v M'Allister 1949 SC 110 MacKinnon v The Iberia Shipping Co Ltd 1955 SC 20 CASES CITED: McKain v R W Miller & Co (SA) Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 1 Machado v Fontes [1897] 2 QB 231 Owners of SS Reresby v Owners of SS Cobetas [1923] Sc LT 719 Phillips v Eyre (1870) LR 6 QB 1 Regie National des Usines Renault SA v Zhang (2002) 187 ALR 1 Romero v International Terminal Operating Co 358 US 354 (1959) Sayers v International Drilling Co NV [1971] 1 WLR 1176 The Arum [1921] P 12 The "Halley" (1868) LR 2 PC 193 The Lotus PCIJ, Series A, No 10 (1927) The Mary Moxham (1876) 1 PD 107 United States v Flores 289 US 137 (1933) Voth v Manildra Flour Mills [Pty Ltd] (1991) 171 CLR 538 Wildenhus' Case 120 US 1 (1887) Yorke v British & Continental Steamship Co Ltd (1945) 78 Ll L Rep 181 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate