NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 133 A Crim R 119
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Trindall [2002] NSWCCA 364 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60020/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 05/03/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 August 2002
PARTIES : Regina v Mark Anthony Trindall JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Grove J at 2; Smart AJ at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 01/31/0209 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Mahoney ADCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : (C) R A Hulme (R) C B Craigie SC SOLICITORS : (C) S E O'Connor (R) Kamilaroi Aboriginal Legal Service CATCHWORDS : Remand on charge of robbery in company to enable offender to undergo rehabilitation so judge could assess non-parole period to be fixed - Court had jurisdiction to entertain Crown appeal - Effect of s.11 of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 on previous law - Remand must be to specified date within 12 months of the finding of guilt. Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act LEGISLATION CITED : Imperial Acts Application Act 1969 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Bail Act 1978 Griffiths v The Queen (1976-77) 137 CLR 293 at 320-321 R v Tindall & Gunton (1993) 74 A Crim R 275 R v Crotty (unrep) CCA 28/2/1994 R v Khoury (unrep) NSWCCA 5/12/94 R v Hartley (unrep) NSWCCA 28/8/96 R v King (unrep) NSWCCA 3/10/96 CASES CITED: R v Kerr (unrep) 26/8/97 R v FR (unrep) NSWCCA 28/5/98 R v Moore (unrep) NSWCCA 23/4/98 R v DWD (unrep) NSWCCA 2/3/98 R v Tocknell (unrep) NSWCCA 28/5/98 R v Clark (1997) 95 A Crim R 585 R v Jones (unrep) NSWCCA 15/4/94 DECISION : See para 67
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate