NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Glover [2002] NSWCCA 376 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60529/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 24 May 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 September 2002
PARTIES : R (NSW) Robert William Glover (Appellant) JUDGMENT OF : Ipp AJA at 1; Studdert J at 2; Dunford J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 01/51/0020 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Freeman DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : PJ Power (Crown) P Segal (Appellant) SOLICITORS : SE O'Connor (Crown) H Schleiger & Associates (Appellant) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - summing up - circumstantial evidence - directions - CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - admissibility - immunity sought by accused re offences charged - whether such evidence likely to be unreliable - whether subject to public interest immunity - CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - admissibility - results of execution of search warrant - CRIMINAL LAW - sentencing - maliciously damage property by means of explosives - potential physical injury to other persons - relevance - severity - special circumstances. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900, ss 46, 47 & 48, 195(b) Evidence Act 1995, ss 135, 137, 165 Shepherd v The Queen (1991) 170 CLR 573 CASES CITED: Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193 The Attorney General of NSW v Stewart (1994) 34 NSWLR 667 The Queen v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 DECISION : See para 64.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60529/01
IPP AJA STUDDERT J DUNFORD J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate