NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v. NGUYEN [2002] NSWCCA 342 revised - 23/08/2002 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA No. 60675 of 2001 HEARING DATE(S) : Friday 28 June 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 August 2002
PARTIES : REGINA v. NGUYEN, Freedom JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Dunford J at 2; Greg James J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 01/21/3145 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Coleman, DCJ. OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Crown: D.M. Woodburne App: T.J. Golding SOLICITORS : Crown: S.E. O'Connor App: D.J. Humphreys CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - appeal - robbery - identification - application to withdraw evidence - unfair prejudice - appropriate identification directions - point not taken at trial - Rule 4 - exculpatory statements in ERISP - whether appropriate jury be directed on relevance of absence of cross-examination - accused not giving evidence - appropriate direction - Rule 4 - inapplicability of earlier decisions after High Court decision in Azzopardi & Davis v. The Queen. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act 1995 Nguyen [2002] NSWCCA 267 Doney (1990) 171 CLR 207 Gugaga (1994) 74 A. Crim. R. 190 Domican (1992) 173 CLR 555 Blick [2000] NSWCCA 61 CASES CITED: Mitton [2002] NSWCCA 124 M (1994) 181 CLR 487 Horton (1998) 45 NSWLR 426 Bargwann (CCA, unreported 15 June 1998) OGD (CCA, unreported 3 June 1997) Jones v. Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Azzopardi & Davis (2001) 205 CLR 50 DECISION : Appeal against conviction dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate