NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Yoseph v Mammo & Ors [2002] NSWSC 585 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3343/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 25/06/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 June 2002
Ramzia Sawa Yoseph - Plaintiff PARTIES : Joseph Francis Mammo - First Defendant Caldon Mammo - Second Defendant Yolanda Elia (nee Mammo) - Third Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
Mr M. Sahade - Plaintiff COUNSEL : First Defendant in Person Mr R.M. Ardino, Solicitor - Second Defendant Mr T.D. Tzovaras, Solicitor - Third Defendant Costa & Associates - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : First Defendant in person Morgan Ardino & Co - Second Defendant Tzovaras Legal - Third Defendant CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - compulsory mediation - factors relevant to order for compulsory mediation - property dispute among close family members - mediation ordered LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 Higgins v Higgins [2002] NSWSC 455 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2001] NSWSC 427 CASES CITED : J L Holdings Pty Ltd v State of Queensland (1997) 189 CLR 146 Morrow v chinadotcom Corp [2001] ANZ Conv R 341 Remuneration Planning Corp Pty Ltd v Fitton [2001] NSWSC 1208 DECISION : Order for compulsory mediation
- 4 - IN THE SUPREME COURT REVISED OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BARRETT J
TUESDAY 25 JUNE 2002
3343/00 - RAMZIA SAWA YOSEPH v JOSEPH FRANCIS MAMMO & ORS
JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate