NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : John Orford v Qi Ying He [2002] NSWCA 152 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40072/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 21 November 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 May 2002
PARTIES : John Orford (Appellant) Qi Ying He (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Beazley JA at 2; Brownie AJA at 58
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 2309/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Dodd DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant: M Walton SC Respondent: M Aldridge SC, P Khandhar SOLICITORS : Appellant: Dibbs Barker Gosling Respondent: Brydens Law Office CATCHWORDS : Limitation period - Motor Accident Act - Assessment of damages - Loss of a chance - Raising new issues on appeal. LEGISLATION CITED : Motor Accident Act 1988 (NSW) Abalos v Australian Postal Commission (1990) 171 CLR 167 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 Devries v Australia National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 Goldspar Australia Pty Ltd v The Council of the City of Sydney [2001] NSWCA 246 CASES CITED: Johnson v Perez (1988) 166 CLR 351 Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638 Nikolaou v Papasaves & Co (1988) 166 CLR 394 O'Brien v Komesaroff (1982) 150 CLR 310 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (1999) 73 ALJR 306 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418 DECISION : See paragraph 57
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate