NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Howard v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2003] NSWCA 188 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 June 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 July 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Santow JA at 1; Young CJ in Eq at 2; Davies AJA at 15 DECISION : 1. Costs below be set aside and, in lieu thereof, the plaintiff, Roger Howard, pay the costs of the arbitration and the defendant, Telstra Corporation Ltd, otherwise pay the costs of the proceedings in the District Court; 2. That the parties abide their own costs of the appeal.
CATCHWORDS : CATCHWORDS: Costs - General Rule - Costs follow the event - Failure to call witnesses at arbitration led to adverse costs order - Fair and just results for costs - Appeal from a discretionary decision of trial judge - Is there conduct that allows the Court to depart from the general rule LEGISLATION CITED : Arbitration (Civil Actions) Act 1983, s18(3) District Court Rules Pt 39A r 31 Australian Coal and Shale Employees' Federation v The Commonwealth (1953) 94 CLR 621 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 CASES CITED : Lovell v Lovell (1950) 81 CLR 513 MacDougall v Curlevski (1996) 40 NSWLR 430 Morgan v Johnson (1998) 44 NSWLR 578 PARTIES : Roger HOWARD (Appellant) TELSTRA CORPORATION LTD (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40576/02 COUNSEL : M L Williams, SC/ P R McGuire (Appellant) W Fitzsimmons (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Carroll & O'Dea (Appellant) Henry Davis York (Respondent)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC 101/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Robison DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate