NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Bhagat v Global Custodians Ltd (No 1) [2001] NSWSC 720 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3406/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 17/08/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 August 2001
Hari Bhagat (P) Global Custodians Ltd (D1) John Healey Speight and Jessee Barrie Marr Speight (D2) Archie Greenlees and Norma Patricia Greenlees (D3) David O'Bryen (D4) PARTIES : Michael Wilkins (D5) Robin Margo (D6) Harold Werksman (D7) Holding Redlich (D8) Jeffrey Flick (D9) Anthony Spencer (D10) JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq
Plaintiff in person COUNSEL : R F Margo SC and A P Spencer (D1-3; 7 & 8) B J Preston SC (D4 & 5) Plaintiff in person SOLICITORS : Holding Redlich (D1-3, 7 & 8) Mallesons Stephen Jaques (D4 & 5) CATCHWORDS : PROFESSIONS [63]- Lawyers- Right of audience- When Court may restrict right under its inherent power of supervision. Grimwade v Meagher [1995] 1 VR 446 CASES CITED : Kooky Garments Ltd v Charlton [1994] 1 NZLR 587 Pacific Air Freighters (Qld) Pty Ltd v Toller (2000) 171 ALR 519 Western Australia v Ward (1997) 76 FCR 492 DECISION : Application refused.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
YOUNG CJ in Eq
FRIDAY 17 AUGUST 2001
3406/01 - HARI BHAGAT v GLOBAL CUSTODIANS LTD & ORS (NO 1)
JUDGMENT - (On plaintiff's application to disqualify defendants' counsel)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate