NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) Aust Torts Reports 81-644
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : THEODORE SKALKOS & ANOR v JOSEPH ASSAF & ANOR [2002] NSWCA 14 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40860/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 24 and 25 September 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 February 2002
PARTIES : THEODORE SKALKOS & ANOR v JOSEPH ASSAF & ANOR JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Giles JA at 88; Fitzgerald AJA at 139
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Common Law Division LOWER COURT CL 18374/93 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Carruthers AJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant: D F Jackson QC/ J A Darvall Respondent: TEF Hughes QC/ K A Rees SOLICITORS : Appellant: Tony Lazaropoulos Respondent: Mallesons Stephen Jaques CATCHWORDS : Defamation - qualified privilege - whether judge conflated issues of malice and excess of occasion of privilege - Judge's conclusions on qualified privilege at common law not a discretionary ruling - whether in emphasising the inaccuracy of the imputations the judge overlooked the fact privilege may be attracted despite untrue defamatory statements - Schedule of questions placed before the jury -form of template misleading - inconsistency in answers - whether trial judge entitled to treat second answer as surplusage - whether answers could not logically stand together - whether s13 Defamation Act defence should have been available - Adequacy of summing up. (D) LEGISLATION CITED : Defamation Act 1974 (NSW) Assaf v Skalkos [2000] NSWSC 418; Austin v Mirror Newspapers Ltd (1985) 3 NSWLR 354; Barbaro v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd (1989) Aust Tort Rep 80-264; Bellino v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1996) 185 CLR 183; Brancato v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1986) 7 NSWLR 30; Bugg v Day (1949) 79 CLR 442; Chappell v Mirror Newspapers Ltd (1984) Aust Torts R 80-691; Dempster v Coates, Court of Appeal, unreported, 11 April 1990; Guise v Kouvelis (1947) 74 CLR 102; Horrocks v Lowe [1975] AC 135; House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; Huntsman Chemical Co Australia Ltd v International Pools Australia Ltd (1995) 36 NSWLR 242; John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Vilo [2001] NSWCA 290; King & Mergen Holdings Pty Ltd v McKenzie (1991) 24 NSWLR 305; CASES CITED: Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520; Liquor Marketing Group v Sadler [2000] NSWCA 161; London Association for Protection of Trade v Greenlands Ltd [1916] 2 AC 15; MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; McDonnell & East Ltd v McGregor (1936) 56 CLR 50; McLean v David Syme & Co Ltd (1970) 72 SR(NSW) 513; Morgan v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1990) 20 NSWLR 511; Morgan v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (No 2) (1991) 23 NSWLR 374; Morosi v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1977] 2 NSWLR 749; Mourani v Jeldi Manufacturing Pty Ltd (1983) 57 ALJR 825; Mowlds v Fergusson (1939) 40 SR(NSW) 311; Otis Elevators Pty Ltd v Zitis (1986) 5 NSWLR 171; Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Parker (1992) 9 NSWLR 448; Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 127; Schulmann v Peters [1961] ALR 209; DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate