NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : TEKNO CERAMICS PTY LTD v ZDENKO MILAT [2003] NSWCA 254 HEARING DATE(S) : 11/09/2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 September 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Handley JA at 2; Foster AJA at 3-16 DECISION : 1. The appeal be upheld. Orders of Delaney DCJ of 4 October 2002 set aside.; 2. In lieu thereof order that the respondent's Notice of Motion of 26 November 2001 be dismissed with costs.; 3. The respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal and in that respect to have a Certificate under the Suitors Fund Act.
CATCHWORDS : Appeal seeking an extension of time in which to bring an action for damages for personal injury. LEGISLATION CITED : s 151D of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) Limitation Act 1969 Itex Graphix Pty Ltd v Elliott, 54 NSWLR 207 CASES CITED : Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 Fox v Percy, 77 ALJR 989 PARTIES : TEKNO CERAMICS PTY LTD - Claimant ZDENKO MILAT - Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40169/03 COUNSEL : Mr J. Hislop QC / R. de Meyrick - Appellant Mr David Burwood - Respondent SOLICITORS : Sparke Helmore - Appellant Frisina & Associates - Respondent
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 1527/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Delaney J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40169/03 DC 1527/01
MEAGHER JA HANDLEY JA FOSTER AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate