NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 57 NSWLR 173
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Newcastle City Council v Shortland Management Services & Ors [2003] NSWCA 156 HEARING DATE(S) : 11 March 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 June 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Mason P at 103; Sheller JA at 104 DECISION : Appeal allowed [101]
CATCHWORDS : TORTS - Negligence - novel duty of care - interaction with statutory scheme - interaction with law of nuisance - whether statutory intention to exclude common law duty of care - whether recognition of duty would undermine legal coherence - TORTS - Negligence - where extension to adjoining property would block views - where statute required notification to adjoining proprietors if council formed opinion enjoyment of land may be detrimentally affected - whether duty of care in formation of opinion as to detrimental effect LEGISLATION CITED : Local Government Act 1919 s 312A Local Government Act 1993 ss 68, 89, 114, 115, 118 Anns v Merton London Borough Council [1978] AC 728 Attorney General v Doughty (1752) 2 Ves. Sen 453 Bathurst City Council v Saban (No 2) (1986) 58 LGRA 201 Buck v Bavone (1976) 135 CLR 110 Caledonian Collieries Limited v Speirs (1957) 97 CLR 202 Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Craig v East Coast Bays City Council [1986] 1 NZLR 99 Crimmins v Stevedoring Industry Finance Committee (1999) 200 CLR 1 Dalton v Angus (1881) 6 App Cas 740 Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002) 77 ALJR 183 Hamman v Lake Macquarie City Council [1999] NSWCA 82 Hornsby Shire Council v Porter (1990) 19 NSWLR 717 Hunter v Canary Wharf Limited [1997] AC 655 Idonz Pty Ltd v National Capital Development Commission (1986) 13 FCR 70 Invercargill City Council v Hamlin [1996] AC 624 Malec v J C Hutton (1991) 169 CLR 638 Meates v Attorney General [1983] NZLR 308 Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Anzil (2000) 205 CLR 254 CASES CITED : Mount Albert Borough Council v Johnson [1979] 2 NZLR 234 Murphy v Brentwood District Council [1991] 1 AC 398 Parkes and Spencer v Rastogi and Newcastle City Council (1992) 78 LGERA 71 Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180 Phipps v Pears [1965] 1 QB 76 Pyrenees Shire Council v Day (1998) 192 CLR 330 Revesz v The Commonwealth (1951) 51 SR (NSW) 63 Reynolds v Katoomba RSL All Services Club Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 43 Rapid Transport Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council (1987) 62 LGRA 88 Scott Group v McFarlane [1978] 1 NZLR 553 Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994) 179 CLR 332 South Pacific Manufacturing Co Limited v NZ Security Consultants Limited [1992] 2 NZLR 282 St Pierre v Ontario [1987] 1 SCR 906 State of New South Wales v Paige (2002) 115 IR 283 Sullivan v Moody (2001) 207 CLR 562 Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424 Tame v New South Wales (2002) 76 ALJR 1348 Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor (1937) 58 CLR 479 William Aldred's Case (1610) 9 Co Rep 57b Newcastle City Council PARTIES : Shortland Management Services Kym Gillen Butler Buttalla Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40930/01 COUNSEL : Mr S Campbell SC / Mr T Bland (Appellant) Mr I D Cullen (Respondents) SOLICITORS : Hunt & Hunt Lawyers (Appellant) Robert Foggo Lawyers (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate