NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Robinson [2003] NSWCCA 188 revised - 11/02/2004 HEARING DATE(S) : 30 May 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 August 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Beazley JA at 1; Hidden J at 1; Carruthers AJ at 1 DECISION : Appeal allowed, conviction quashed and a new trial ordered.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - conviction appeal - appellant convicted of murder of fellow inmate at Junee Correctional Centre - whether the directions given on the approach that the jury should take to the evaluation and assessment of the evidence of prisoner informer witnesses were adequate - whether the directions given on the approach that the jury should take to the assessment of the evidence of witnesses who might reasonably be regarded as accomplices were adequate - whether the trial judge erred in directing the jury that warnings regarding the potential unreliability of prison informers applied to evidence favourable to the accused by such informers - whether the trial judge erred in admitting the evidence of admissions allegedly made by the appellant to the police prosecutor at a bail hearing - whether such alleged admissions made during the course of official questioning - whether evidence of such alleged admissions unfair to the appellant as he was not given the opportunity by the police prosecutor to adopt or deny the alleged admissions - whether his Honour erred in allowing evidence of witness declared unfavourable to go to the jury - whether his Honour's directions on DNA evidence involved the error known as "the prosecutor's fallacy" - whether appropriate directions given in relation to defence case that, on the whole of the evidence, a fellow inmate named Johnson may have murdered the deceased - whether the verdict of the jury was unreasonable having regard to the evidence. Crimes Act 1960 s 424A (now repealed) LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Procedure Act 1986 s 108 (now s 281) Evidence Act 1995 ss38, 128, 135, 136, 137, 165, 165(1), 165(1)(a), (d), (e) Brooks (1999) 103 A Crim R 234 Domican v The Queen (1991-1992) 173 CLR 555 Driscoll v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 517 Horton (1998-1999) 104 A Crim R 306 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 505 JCG (2001) 127 A Crim R 493 Jamieson, Elliott and Blessingdon (1992) 60 A Crim R 68 Julin [2000] TASSC 50 Keir (2002) 127 A Crim R 198 CASES CITED : McKinney v The Queen (1990-1991) 171 CLR 476 Marlow & Kelly (2001-2002) 129 A Crim R 51 Moffatt (2000) 112 A Crim R 201 Pavic v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 159 Pollitt v The Queen (1991-1992) 174 CLR 558 R v Clough (1992) 28 NSWLR 396 R v Clout (1996-1997) 41 NSWLR 312 R v GK (2001) 53 NSWLR 317 R v Sullivan [2003] NSWCCA 100 Stephens v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 664 Van der Meer v The Queen (1988) 62 ALJR 656 PARTIES : Regina v Harry Robinson FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60398/00 COUNSEL : Appellant - P. Byrne SC / G.A. Bashir Crown - L.M.B. Lamprati SOLICITORS : Appellant - Ross Hill & Associates Crown - S.E. O'Connor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate