NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Chai [2002] NSWCCA 512 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60550/98 HEARING DATE(S) : No further hearing (counsel relied on earlier submissions) JUDGMENT DATE : 20 December 2002
PARTIES : Regina Chong Mun Chai JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Sperling J at 1; Bergin J at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 70208/97 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL James J OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr M G Sexton SC for the Crown Mr G Nicholson QC with Mr B W Cross for the Appellant S E O'Connor for the Director of Public Prosecutions SOLICITORS : S N Goodsell for the Appellant
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - appeal against conviction - principles relating to the exclusion of or limiting the use of evidence for "unfair prejudice" pursuant to ss 136 & 137 of the Evidence Act 1995 - whether trial judge was bound to do so of his own motion - otherwise, no question of principle Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s6 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Rules, r4 Evidence Act 1995, s66, s136, s137, s165 Ambrosoli [2002] NSWCCA 386 Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 Chai [2000] NSWCCA 320 Chai [2002] HCA 12 Ellis [1910] 2 KB 747 CASES CITED: GK (2001) 53 NSWLR 317 Ignjatic (1993) 68 A Crim R 333 Johns (1979-80) 143 CLR 108 Papakosmas (1999) 196 CLR 297 Stirland [1944] AC 327 Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545 TKWJ [2002] HCA 46 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate