NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Brierly v Biggs & Sons Development P/L & 1 Or [2002] NSWCA 362 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40483 of 2002 HEARING DATE(S) : 31/10/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 31 October 2002
Peter Brierly PARTIES : v Biggs & Sons Development Pty Limited & 1 Or JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1, 15; Hodgson JA at 8; Foster AJA at 13
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 419 of 2000 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Twigg DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
A: M Duncan COUNSEL : 1 R: J Marshall SC & J White 2 R: D Russell SC SOLICITORS : A: Johnstone Robinson R: Phillips Fox CATCHWORDS : Costs - whether respondent entitled to costs of first cross-claim - whether appellant entitled to costs of second cross-claim - appeal allowed. CASES CITED: Australian Securities Commissioner v Aust-Home Investments Limited (1993) 44 FCR 194 Gribbles v Health Insurance Commission (1997) 80 FCR 284 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed; 2. "No order for costs" order from below set aside; 3. In lieu thereof the orders should be that Biggs & Sons Development Pty Limited pay the costs of Peter Brierly; 4. Summercraft Blinds, Awnings & Security Pty Limited should pay the costs of Biggs including the costs which Biggs has to pay Brierly; 5. Summercraft Blinds to pay the costs of the application and appeal of both Brierly & Biggs & Sons
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40483 of 2002
MEAGHER JA HODGSON JA FOSTER AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate