NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 54 NSWLR 300 130 A Crim R 238
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v SHARMA [2002] NSWCCA 142 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60894/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 15/4/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 April 2002
PARTIES : Regina Ravinesh Dutt SHARMA JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Mason P at 86; Barr J at 87; Bell J at 88; McClellan J at 89
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 01/11/0378 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Woods QC DCJ OFFICER :
G E Smith / E A Wilkins (Crown) COUNSEL : C B Craigie SC / H Cox (Respondent) R D Cogswell SC / M Buscombe / B Baker (Attorney General) A C Haesler SC (Senior Public Defender) S E O'Connor (Crown) SOLICITORS : Glenn K Walsh (Respondent) I V Knight (Attorney General) D J Humphreys (Public Defender) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - crown appeal against sentence - armed robbery in company - plea of guilty - whether error in separate account for and quantification of plea - "two stage approach" - whether error in taking into account utilitarian value of plea - objective and subjective considerations - "ambiguous" - whether R v Thomson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 should be overruled - whether sentence manifestly inadequate - Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s22 - Interpretation Act 1987, s34 Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 LEGISLATION CITED : Interpretation Act 1987 Penalties and Sentences Act 1985 (Vic) Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) Sentencing Act 1995 (WA) AB v The Queen (1999) 198 CLR 111 Bowtell v Goldsborough Mort & Co Ltd (1905) 3 CLR 444 Cameron v The Queen [2002] HCA 6; 76 ALJR 382 Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia (1990) 169 CLR 436 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v EI Karhani (1990) 21 NSWLR 370 Ellerman Lines Ltd v Murray [1931] AC 126 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 R v AEM Snr [2002] NSWCCA 58 R v Donnelly [1998] 1 VR 645 R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 R v Giakas [1988] VR 973 R v Gray [1977] VR 225 R v Hall (1994) 76 A Crim R 454 CASES CITED: R v Laurentiu and Becheru (1992) 63 A Crim R 402 R v Morton [1986] VR 863 R v Paull (1990) 20 NSWLR 427 R v Pham (1991) 55 A Crim R 128 R v Place [2002] SASC 101 R v Powell [2001] SASC 450 R v Shannon (1979) 21 SASR 442 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534 R v Sutherland (SASC, 16 November 1992, unreported) R v Thomson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Winchester (1992) 58 A Crim R 345 Repatriation Commission v Vietnam Veterans' Association (2000) 48 NSWLR 548 Siganto v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 656 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 76 ALJR 79 DECISION : 1. Crown appeal allowed; 2. Sentence imposed quashed; 3. Respondent sentenced to two years imprisonment with a non-parole period of eighteen months, after which the Respondent is to be released to parole.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate