NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Quach [2002] NSWCCA 173 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60567/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 13/05/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 May 2002
PARTIES : Regina Trung Quach JUDGMENT OF : O'Keefe J at 1; Smart AJ at 49
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/11/0926 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Woods ADCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr D G Dalton - Applicant Mr G I O Rowling - Respondent SOLICITORS : Rodney Van Houten - Applicant S E O'Connor - DPP - Respondent CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - Appeal - Leave to appeal against sentence - Causing grievous bodily harm with intent to murder - Offence objectively serious - Circumstances serious - Error in sentencing - Character disregarded as mitigating factor - Sentence imposed not excessive - Sentence imposed appropriate LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes Act 1900 Ryan v The Queen [2001] HCA 21 Regina v Kanj [2000] NSWCCA 408 CASES CITED: Regina v Green [2001] NSWCCA 258 Regina v Glen [1994] NSWCCA unreported 19 December 1994 Regina v Kotevski (1998) NSWCCA unreported 3 April 1998 Regina v Oinonen [1999] NSWCCA 310 DECISION : 1. Leave to appeal granted; 2. Appeal dismissed.
- 13 -IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60567/01
O'Keefe J Smart AJ
15 May 2002 Regina v TRUNG QUACH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate