NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Idoport Pty Limited & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors; Idoport Pty Limited & Anor v Donald Robert Argus; Idoport Pty Limited ("JMG") v National Australia Bank Limited [37] [2001] NSWSC 838 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50113/98; 50026/99; 3991/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 28/09/01, 2/10/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 October 2001
Idoport Pty Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Market Holdings Pty Limited (Plaintiff) National Australia Bank Limited (Defendant) Donald Robert Argus (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
COUNSEL : Mr JJ Garnsey QC, Mr M Dicker, Mr R Titterton, Mr R Alkadamani (Plaintiffs) Mr T Bathurst QC, Mr R Smith SC, Mr H Insall SC, Mr J Halley (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Withnell Hetherington (Plaintiffs) Freehills (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : Practice and procedure - Just, quick and cheap overriding purpose rule - Case management procedures - Conduct of litigation not merely a matter for the parties but also one for the court - Public interest in the proper allocation of scarce resources as between courts - Extended litigation leading to one of three Commercial List Judges being unavailable to hear other cases for several years - Multiple experts - Procedure for Court appointed examiner to take cross-examination evidence from selected experts Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (UK) Evidence on Commission Act 1995 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Foreign Evidence Act 1994 (Cth Supreme Court Act (NSW) 1970 Supreme Court Rules (NSW) 1970 Ahmedi v Ahmedi ( 1991) 23 NSWLR 288 Alanbert Pty Ltd v Bulevi Pty Ltd [2000] NSWSC 610 Bangkok Bank Ltd v Swatow Lace Co Ltd [1963] NSWR 488 Berdan v Greenwood (1880) 20 Ch D 764 Bomanite Pty Ltd v Slatex Corp Australia Pty Ltd (1991) 32 FCR 379 Cambridge Credit Corp Ltd v Hutcheson (No 3) (1983) 8 ACLR 526 Chambers v Jobling (1986) 7 NSWLR 1 Clune v Watson [1882] Tarl 75 Coch v Allcock & Co 21 QBD 178 Connelly v Director of Public Prosecutions [1964] AC 1254 David Holdings Pty Ltd v Attorney General of the Commonwealth [(1994) 49 FCR 211 Devis v Turnbull (1822) 6 Madd 232, 56 ER 1080 Ehrman v Ehrman [1896] 2 Ch 611 at 616 Elna Australia Pty Ltd v International Computers (Australia) Pty Ltd (1987) 14 FCR 461 Garcin v Amerindo Investment Advisors Ltd [1991] 4 All ER 655 Hardie Rubber Co Pty Ltd v The General Tyre and Rubber Co (1973) 129 CLR 521 Harding v Bourke (2000) 48 NSWLR 598 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] AC 280 Henderson v Primmer (1986) 68 ACTR 9 Idoport Pty Limited & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors (1999) NSWSC 828 Idoport Pty Limited & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors [2000) 49 NSWLR 51 CASES CITED : Idoport Pty Limited & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors [2000] NSWSC 338 Idoport Pty Limited & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors [2000] NSWSC 1215 Idoport Pty Limited & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors [2000] NSWSC 1250), Idoport Pty Limited & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors [2001] NSWSC 123 Idoport Pty Limited & Anor v National Australia Bank Limited & 8 Ors [2001] NSWSC 744 Joyce v Yeomans [1981] 1 WLR 549 Leda Holdings v Water Board (supra) Lord Belmore v. Anderson (1792) 2 Cox 288, 30 ER 134 Maynard v West Midlands Regional Health Authority [1984] 1 WLR 634 Milne v Benjafield & 3 Ors [2000] NSWSC 171 Moodalay v. Morton (1785) 1 Brown Ch Cas. 469, 28 ER 1245 Poschung v Jones 25/10/96, NSWSC, unreported, BC9606849 Sali v SPC Ltd (1993) 67 ALJR 841 Savcor Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales [2001] NSWSC 596 State of Queensland v JL Holdings (1997) 189 CLR 146 The McKay Machinery Co Ltd v Turner and Another (1900) 16 WN (NSW) 192 Thorpe v. Macauley (1820) 5 Madd 218, 56 ER 877 Walt Disney Productions v H John Edwards Publishing Co Pty Ltd (1952) 69 WN (NSW) 281 WEA Records Ltd v Visions Channel 4 Ltd [1983] 1 WLR 721 Williams v Mutual Life Association of Australasia (1904) 4 SR (NSW) 677 Willis v Trequair (1906) 3 CLR 912 Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority (1980) AC 1074 Woolf v Masius Wynne-Williams & D'Arcy Macmanus (Australia) Pty Ltd [1975] ACLD DT 98 (NSW SC) at 98 DECISION : Court appointed examiner to take cross-examination evidence from experts to be identified following further submissions.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate