NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 20 ACLC 529
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Brown v DML Resources (No.5) [2001] NSWSC 973 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3830/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 October 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 31 October 2001
Martin Russell Brown and Timothy James Cumming (P & A) PARTIES : DML Resources Pty Limited (In liquidation) (D1) DML Resources (WA) Pty Limited (In liquidation) (D2) BP Australia Ltd (R) JUDGMENT OF : Austin J
COUNSEL : B Rayment QC with C R Newlinds (P & A) B Coles QC with M Ashhurst (R) SOLICITORS : Kemp Strang (P & A) Carneys, Lawyers (R) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - liquidator's application for extension of three year limitation period to make application to challenge voidable transactions - application filed within three years but respondent not joined as party - whether joinder of respondent as party to application for extension of time, outside the three year limitation period, is barred by s 588ff(3)(b) - whether SCR Pt 8 r 11(3) applies to joinder of respondent LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001(Cth), ss 588ff, 1322 Supreme Court Rules, Pt 8 r 8, Pt 8 r 11, Pt 20 r 1, Pt 20 r 4 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 Baldry v Jackson [1976] 2 NSWLR 415 Brown v DML Resources (No 2) [2001] NSWSC 590 Brown v DML Resources (No 3) [2001] NSWSC 719 Brown v DML Resources (No 4) [2001] NSWSC 947 CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384 Fernance v Nominal Defendant (1989) 17 NSWLR 710 CASES CITED : Lloyd Steel (Aust) Pty Ltd v Jade Shipping SA (1985) 1 NSWLR 212 Rogers v Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 29 ACSR 270 Star v National Australia Bank Ltd (1999) 30 ACSR 583 Twenty-First Australia Inc v Shade [1998] NSWSC 325 Wardley Australia Ltd v State of Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 Warner v Sampson [1959] 1 QB 297 Weldon v Neal (1887) 19 QBD 394 Wenham v General Credits Ltd (Supreme Court of NSW, McLelland J, 16 December 1988, unreported) DECISION : Upon reconsideration, no ground for altering determinations made in judgment delivered on 29 August 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate