NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Pollock v Stickfast Labels Pty Limited (In Liq) [2002] NSWCA 360 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40433/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 31/10/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 31 October 2002
PARTIES : Brendan Pollock (Appellant) Stickfast Labels Pty Limited (In Liquidation) (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 20; Ipp JA at 1; Foster AJA at 22
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Compensation Court LOWER COURT CC 56418/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Ashford CCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : B McManamey (Appellant) W Kearns SC (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Spooner & Hall (Appellant) A O Ellison & Co (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : WORKERS COMPENSATION - whether personal injury sustained by the appellant arose out of or in the course of employment - where appellant stopped authorised work for the sole purpose of administering a dose of heroin - where the injury was sustained after the heroin was administered - whether administering of heroin was in the course of employment - whether in the circumstances s 14(2) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 is applicable - appeal dismissed. ND LEGISLATION CITED : Compensation Court Act 1984, s 32(1) Workers Compensation Act 1987, s 14(2) Hatzimanolis v A N I Corporation Limited (1992) 173 CLR 473 CASES CITED: Henderson v Commissioner of Railways (WA) (1937) 58 CLR 281 Higgins v Galibal Pty Limited (1998) 45 NSWLR 45 Humphrey Earl Limited v Speechley (1951) 84 CLR 126 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40433/02 CC 56418/00
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate