NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Earsman v Wagga Mobile Cranes P/L [2002] NSWSC 675 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12692/2001 HEARING DATE(S) : 29 July 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 August 2002
Mark Gregory Earsman (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Wagga Mobile Cranes Pty Limited (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
Mr E U Romaniuk (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr James Stewart (Defendant) Farrell Lusher, Wagga Wagga by their agents Turner Whelan SOLICITORS : (Plaintiff)
PricewaterhouseCooper Legal (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Extension of time - ss 60C & E Limitation Act LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) - ss 60C & E The Council of City of Sydney v Zegarac (1998) 43 NSWLR 195 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylotr (1996) 186 CLR 541; 139 ALR 1 Holt v Wynter [2000] 49 NSWLR 128 CASES CITED : McLean v Sydney Water Corporation [2001] NSWCA 122 Szerdahelyi v Bailey, Ortado v Bailey and Lewis Bailey (NSWSC unreported, Badgery-Parker J, 1 May 1997) Dow Corning Australia Pty Ltd v Paton, Meares v Paton (1998) Aust Torts Reports 81-485 Fitzgerald v Bankstown City Council (NSWCA unreported 6 November 1995) Manfield v Heather [2000] NSWCA 36 DECISION : (1) Leave is granted to extent the limitation period against the defendant in relation to an accident which occurred on 30 August 1996 up to and including 16 August 2002; (2) The plaintiff is to file and serve a statement of claim on or before 16 August 2002; (3) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate