NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : PRESTON v HARBOUR PACIFIC & ORS [2002] NSWSC 1256 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20900 OF 2002 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 December 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 December 2002
ALEXANDER PRESTON (Plaintiff)
v
HARBOUR PACIFIC UNDERWRITING MANAGEMENT PTY LTD (ACN 003 406 611) (First Defendant)
TERENCE SEAN McCABE (Second Defendant) PARTIES : BRUCE PAUSEY (Third Defendant)
CHRISTOPHER DONALD WOOD (Fourth Defendant)
MICHAEL MAHER & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD (ACN 002 688 566) (Fifth Defendant)
MICHAEL MAHER (Sixth Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Levine J
M Coffey (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : T Blackburn (First Defendant) Gells (Plaintiff)
Phillips Fox (First Defendant) SOLICITORS : Acuiti Legal (Second, Third & Fourth Defendants)
Hunt & Hunt (Fifth & Sixth Defendants) CATCHWORDS : Discovery - application for inspection LEGISLATION CITED : s183 Evidence Act (1995) Attorney General of Northern Territory v Maurice (1996) 161 CLR 475 CASES CITED : Goldberg v Ng (1995) 185 CLR 83 Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 428 DECISION : See paragraphs 23 and 24
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate